Wipro Unza Malaysia Employee Reviews & Ratings

Pay remains steady as per company

Nothing as such, good place

Leadership decisions are based on favourism driving in-competency and hence leading to lower revenue growth, increasing risks of job security for lower band people.

No flexibility whatsoever and also substandard pay

we ahve managenment issue with emplyers at prokect level.

Good offfice, Bad Leaders, Bad managers

Pay is comparatively less than some others

NA , No cons Salary hikes

No much benefits in side

No cons available and all good

Not transparency in policies of wipro

Management is not very effective. There is poor planning, no transparency, and employees often feel unheard and unsupported

No cons from my end

No expected salary for existing employees

here are no notable cons, as it is an excellent company to work for.

Micromanage, favoritism, lack of support

Low salary hikes, slow career growth

Less hike, have to extend shifts

Work-Life balance can be challenging at times

Less Salary in junior roles.

Nothing to discuss no faults

Paid will be less than other companies

Benefits are not as good

If you have luck, you will get good project otherwise you need to work in support project. After sometime you can make a switch to other projects internally.

Salary was too less and no increment

Promotion, Salary hike and none other than these

Waste of time and career

All bad including salary and work life balance

nothing to mention as MNC

Freshers are hired but for 4 years as per market standards there is no proper pay

Vertical growth is slower since there are very experienced people already working on those roles.

Hectic timings and process. Low salary

Getting project on your own will be bit difficult if its not done from Wipro manager/team,

Work load increased No increment or appraisal No professional progress

No cons to say all good

Nothing found wrong in campus.

No cons as such to mention.

Work Pressure Work pressures Work pressures

Minimum support from HR. Finding a project is difficult.

Many employees report that the initial salary is lower than industry standards, especially for freshers and junior positions, with slow increments over time. • Project and technology allocation often overlook prior experience or personal technical interests, leading to dissatisfaction if employees are not flexible with their domains. • Management quality and communication can be inconsistent, with some teams experiencing poor leadership and lack of support during client escalations or career development. • High-pressure environments and demanding workloads are noted, especially for those seeking rapid career growth or working with frequent leadership changes. • Changing projects or technologies is difficult, and efforts may not be rewarded proportionally to contributions; many employees observe that staying long-term does not always result in significant term benefits. • Some reviews cite high turnover rates, less interaction with senior managers, and limited support from HR or QA for long-term career prospects.

Need projects in vizag for good

For scholar trainee role the there was a bond of 5 years

the same thing applies here

No proper hike to the employees

*Initial training could be more role-specific *Project allocation takes some time *Career path clarity in the first 90 days can be improved

worked more hours and got less pay

Sone times there are no projects

Unstable projects location constraint and problem with management

1. Technical teams are led by non technical persons knowing nothing technical - Causing unnecessary chaos in the team. 2. HR tends to align on the side of senior leadership 3. Micromanaging by cluster heads 4. Low and inconsistent pay raises. 5. Biased ratings by cluster heads. 6. It's basically you work 24*7, you get calls outside your working hours and new tasks are assigned.

No internal growth for existing employees