AIA Malaysia (Insurance) Employee Reviews & Ratings

However individual agency might have diffrent coaching style, which might not able to fit everyone.

comission based type of role

Company sometimes did not listen to employees feedback

Not good for short stay

Lots of overtime work, need duty travel.

Need job fit for basics. Can do, pay well millions, like to do job.

Pay is fairly low for what you do as you are the front line of the company you deal with the customers also the strictness of being in the office recent restructure that shaked everything up lost alot of great employees due to it

Management team is manipulative that likes to blame subordinate while claims all the credit, micro manage

high level of self discipline

Kpi oriented and need to chase numbers

not really a great place to enhance skills

High working pressure, customer called for complaination everyday.

Non sustainable for those lacking initiative and drive

Self employed, lower commission rate, many meetings

Location may be limited to other food outlets

Limited promotion opportunities due to bell curve. Its pretty difficult to get promoted.

So many meetings to attend

Pressure working environment/salary is not the high at the beginning

• Commission-based income can be unstable, especially early on • High self-motivation and discipline required to succeed • Pressure to meet targets during peak seasons • Work-life balance may be tough at times due to client demands • Admin processes can be improved for efficiency

long hours, cried a few times

Limitations on budget, staffing and opportunities to work with external vendors. Almost all are done in-house. But not a big issue (except on limitation on software usage for work)

Depends on what agency you join, can be toxic

Have to constantly looking out for leads Received little support from agency.

High Sales targets to achieve every quarter

need to constantly work hard at it

No comments , not allowed to reveal

The boss tried to play politics and always pressuring new and old staff into internal polticis affair. The team gone through restructuring after most of us left.

No AWS and little salary increment.

Can be stressful at times.

Very poor pay compared to other companies

I couldn't think of any cons.

No clear leadership, no clear career advancement path

The frequency is twice a month

hard to promotion , a lots of no use policy

Slower career progression and slightly lower-than-average annual increment

Don't really have any Cons, may be need longer time

bit too bureaucratic but overall good

Can get stressful over time

None to what I can think of

Fluctuate In salary and will have pressure if you not yet active on that month.

- Workload may be high (depends on which department)

Nothing bad. I love the company

Hard to get new business based on one's own network

Long hours though can be fun with the amazing colleagues

Change of structure is a daily issue, fire fighting everyday, people are jaded

Very poor work life balance

Commission-based structure means income can be unstable at the start.

Salary increment needs to be more reflective of contribution

Company abit stupid not the smartest admin

Micromanage to the next level, u get hired for a role and suddenly the role , job, and even your timing changes. Incompetent managers checking and pushing you at all times , allowance not good enough to work in shifts, messy structure and no proper decisions