Pfizer Employee Reviews & Ratings

Poor leadership from the top. Projects drag on that should be killed months prior.

it can get monotonous quickly

May be put on a poor shift pattern

Hi Pressure environment and managers lack management skills. Do not promote team environment.

Low pay compared to industry standards Lot of work Terrible leadership at top No strategic long-term vision from Executive Leadership: your job security depends on PFE share prices on any given week. No accountability of senior leadership (Read Reddit forums).

Hours were terrible, 60hrs min expected Always Cost cutting

Lower paying than other companies

Stakeholders can create a great deal of noise depending the project

Thy protect employees that cause problems

Not seen yet such condition

Pearl River is a whack place.

Intense Workload: Managing complex trials may lead to long hours and high-pressure situations, potentially impacting work-life balance. Regulatory Challenges: Navigating stringent regulations and compliance issues can be demanding and stressful. Resource Constraints: Dealing with budget limitations and resource constraints may pose challenges in executing comprehensive research programs. Project Uncertainties: Facing unexpected obstacles and uncertainties in clinical trials, which can be emotionally and professionally taxing.

Long hours in sales jobs

Hard to communicate the boss who speaks foreign languages.

It’s hybrid model of working

Not a lot of growth opportunities.

Pivoting away from innovation, focused only on short term wins, lots of internal strife, yes men at the top of the org chart

Some of the people in charge and very long time employees not so nice and heavy handed.

Not very agile in my field

Management was not great in teaching

Busy Overtime Clients Democratic Friendly

Minorities are often overlooked for advancement opportunities, ousted out of training opportunities, and Pfizer's diversity and inclusion program is a joke. There is a VERY SPECIFIC demographic that they look for when promoting from within, experience and merit don't matter if you fit their criteria.

Focus can shift quickly and work-life balance

Very competitive environment and slow career progress

Purely M&A company; week in R&D

Management can be difficult to work with. Shifts can be long and mandatory overtime happens frequently.

Demanding work and lofty expectations towards timelines.

Like many large organizations, the cross functional collaborations are key to success but present a strong obstacle to overcome.

too big of a company to care about people.

Limited growth vertically lower than average compensation

Management only cares about themselves Lots of additional weekend work

Can be slower to get things to clinic than biotech

There are constant structure changes

gym wellness day and cafeteria

There are no cons it’s a great company

Results vary dependent on research unit

Typical management issues generally prevalent in arge multinational companies...

Schedule was not for me

Poor leadership, promotions based on perceptions rather than merit (no one is actually checking to see whether new “projects” are doing more good than harm), discriminatory, and simply put - a cluster.

Low salary Limited opportunity within the company

senior Management is not really great.

The company is constantly reor

Highly Regulated Environment – Strict compliance can slow down projects.

Pharma layoffs, insane timelines, corporate bureaucracy

Limited opportunities for development and career progression

Restructuring often seen in large pharma

Career progression and certain roles are contract only

A bit stressful with boss

The salary is too low

Shrinking business size, office politics, less regional roles, no education allowance like MBA, too many compliance