AIA Malaysia (Insurance) Employee Reviews & Ratings

slightly low salary compare to the market

Stakeholders a bit standoff-ish, need to have more background study

It depends on the agency u join. Some is to groom u, some is to ruin u. Careful of the beautiful picture they paint.

Tedious work, a lot of doing the same tasks

No disadvantages. Everything is perfect.

Odd and Long working hours

unfair persistency for bses, you cannot get your com

Bonus will not be that high

Not fully work from home.

KPI pressure from the supervisor and management.

Sales job not for me

I dont see any cons

Long working hours, OT is compulsory, micro managing

Much process Short staff Multiple role require to cater both existing app and new projects

Long OT and need to work in holidays

nothing in particular, own hard work

sometimes have no work life balance

Sales role is cut throat

Fast pace and hectic. No work life balance

management are, but overall cons

Lack of development for staff Micro management No incentives Lack of staff which you have to do what is included in your role No progression

Outdated sale system in life insurance

only 1 day wfh, short of smart desk, poor office chair.

Sometimes no task is given and couldn't learn anything

Nothing to be said here

Long hours of work time. No holidays.

once broke considered sold to

not that many to be honest

work efficiency and hierachy can be improved

Challenging to raise awareness on financial planning.

Pros more than cons, above average

- only near MRT Bukit bintang, no LRT

Lots of dirty politics. Some directors are protected besides doing the wrong thing to staff. HR leaders not walking the talk

Nothing falls into this category

Pay wise seems a bit lower.

Resource crunch is a problem occasionally

Need to achieve monthly target

Less competitive Perks Pay is fair

Nothing make me feel like it's cons

a lost of control, need Vaccination

Cold calling, lead acquisition, business costs

Use stupid procedure for recruiting. Since the offering will based on reference & employment checking then why don't proceed this step first before decide to do offering. Should not offered candidate with not finalised offered to hold the candidates. Then when the reference check result is not satisfied by company just withdraw the offered. This stupid practice take more than 2 weeks and that time candidate might have other offers

micro management and average salary

The company conducts layoffs annually, often citing redundancy due to changes in business direction, yet subsequently rehires for the same roles in different departments. Recently, we experienced another round of layoffs, with entire departments being let go after a year of mass hiring. This pattern raises concerns about job security within the organization.

not really any. people are boring maybe

Bad management for AIA IT M. Poor benefit in the industry

Pay is at market or below average

Bureaucracy is quite complicated to be worked on

Things get slowed down for non-business requirements

Vietnam BU has terrible execution, terrible adaption. some of group idea is twisted beyond recognition, leading to worse and worse result. IT department is another level of bad execution and bad management. Managers abuse position. not sure if group is taking action, but massive change in leadership team during 2023, no official announcement was made. not only that, turbulence in market growth cause negativity to surface. before, anything can be overlooked with a good business year, but as crisis damage the whole market, poor leadership, poor mindset and hazardous practice start to show consequences. it is the epitome of the head think of one thing but legs and arms just not listen.