Cargill Reviews

Management Team so young and not enough experience

Everything involves corporate red tape Mass layoffs handled like slaughtering cattle Company used to have good values but has gone completely WOKE Still growing outside the U.S. but laying off U.S. workers Complete mis-management from upper management. Focused on Greed not Employees. If you speak up about something they will just fire you Cut their Food Safety and Personal safety people and programs by huge amounts in the mass layoffs.

Lots of them here. Insular workforce, very local, suspicious of outsiders

Higher levels of stress since layoffs in December

Management HR Company policy Micro management Employee voice not heard

Technology leadership lacks credibility and competence Many technology leaders do not possess sufficient technical or strategic understanding of the domains they oversee. Experienced professionals are routinely managed by individuals who do not understand the work, yet make consequential decisions about scope, priorities, and performance. This creates dysfunction, rework, and constant frustration. Institutionalized overwork and role exploitation Job descriptions are deliberately vague and endlessly expanded. High-performing employees are expected to absorb leadership gaps, operational failures, and cross-functional work with no increase in authority, title, or compensation. Over-functioning is not an exception—it is the operating model. Gaslighting disguised as culture “People-first,” “psychological safety,” and “work-life balance” are heavily promoted but poorly practiced, particularly in DT&D. Employees who raise valid concerns are minimized, labeled as difficult, or told they are the problem rather than the environment. Extraction of senior talent without reciprocity Experienced employees are used to stabilize teams, train others, and make leadership look functional while being denied advancement or meaningful recognition. Loyalty is leveraged, not rewarded. Disrespectful and opaque layoff practices Layoffs are handled with minimal transparency and little regard for tenure, contribution, or institutional knowledge. Employees who carried the organization through years of change are treated as easily replaceable. No viable path for growth Exceptional performance does not lead to advancement. The message is clear: give more, expect less.

Job will be repetitive and harsh on body, be prepared.

All good, got none to comment.

cost cutting, work load heavy, micro management.

No WFH policy for women