SEGi University

not well paid even if they say so

High staff turnover. No salary increment, you will stuck with the same salary for years but keep on getting appointment letter for additional task. It is almost impossible to get promoted. The top management (SEGi Group) too ambitious in giving new direction but with minimal resources and short period. Standardizing across centre very difficult as some of them not cooperative. Too many bosses to attend and getting approval. The yearly KPI doesn't make sense to some job function as being setup by non related department/person in charge which know/expert the for the respective job. Senior staff/existing staff which have works like forever in SEGi not really productive and innovative, lack of technology skills, unwilling to learn and refuse to go out from their comfort zone.

Workloads keep coming. Meeting the demands.

Too many office politic and bias

My time at this institution was very challenging due to issues with management practices. There was a lack of fairness and transparency in decision-making, where personal preferences often influenced outcomes more than merit or performance. Workload distribution was unequal, with some individuals having the privilege of choosing easier tasks, while more difficult responsibilities were pushed onto others. Compensation also became a point of contention. Instead of appreciating experience or prior achievements, higher pay was often treated as a justification to expect disproportionately more work — even when colleagues were on the same level. This created an unhealthy and demotivating environment, especially since salary differences were largely due to previous companies’ practices and not the employees’ fault. Another concerning issue was the lack of empathy and support for staff well-being. Flexibility was rarely granted even in situations that required compassion, leaving employees to feel pressured into prioritizing work over health and family. When concerns were raised, they were often dismissed or ignored, as some staff seemed protected by their connections with higher management. Overall, the culture prioritized hierarchy and favoritism over professionalism, leaving little room for growth or genuine support. I believe with fairer practices, greater transparency, and real accountability, this could have been a much healthier workplace.

Old facilities, not much support from management, no claims for travel expenses.

Underpaid, no bonus for few years.

Pay not as lucrative when starting out. However this is expected in the education industry.

Must be have a armguard standby at lobby

salary quite low for executive level