SEGi University Employee Reviews & Ratings

I need a change. Salary low Needs to be more professional

Lecture given too many subjects to teach

office politics and management decision

Shortage of manpower, workload is high depending on the department you are placed in, lecturers are also responsible for student numbers

Multi tasking and too little time for preparation of the subjects

Not good for future development

My experience was absolutely satisfactory

Sometimes the job can be very stressful

The management do not know what they are actually prioritising.. They seem to be in their own lost world and expect employees to be tagging along with them

Just and institution with bad management, bad environment, bad colleagues and bad system

Very low pay Lack of employee's recognition and award programme Student first, lecturer second mentality

This company tend to hire unskilled, imcompotent management, most of the management does not understand leadership, instead, they push and control stuff to do what they want them to do.

Unable to see the cons as pros is very high.

I’ve noticed that the career progression and salary increments seem to be moving at a slower pace than expected. I believe there may be opportunities to improve the overall growth trajectory, both in terms of skill development and advancement within the company. It would be helpful to explore ways to enhance career progression and ensure more consistent increments moving forward

hard to move forward in terms of career growth

the university is too big the college and uni difference is too much

a good education system for internationals

Lacks people (employee) orientation.

Have a high turnover of staffs

- Great chance to meet new people. Staff turnover is very high. -They go for endless meetings with zero outcomes. Processes and meetings are not translated into numbers and quality. - Staff will be asked to give fresh ideas only to be told that all those ideas are worthless and that the top management ideas are better and must be carried out immediately, no questions asked or else.... Then a few moments later your initial ideas have been re-branded and it becomes "their idea". Cetak rompak number 1. Then they change their direction before ideas can be properly carried out. Very short term views. - facilities is very bad. - takes in a lot of unqualified students that do not meet the minimum educational requirements... as long as they can pay, can get degrees. - parking is the worst. - lifts breakdown almost every month. - Disregard for Occupational and Safety Health. Move staff and conduct classes for students in building that is still under renovation. - top management only care for money. - Favourite staffs are those who are willing to create magic files for MQA and also those who have side projects with students to create fake good review for the college online. -top management and hr will throw you under the bus, if it will save their own skin - No recognition or appreciation for staff, turnover is very high.

Not much benefit and allowance

The salary is quite low. Too many SOP that need to follow

I don't like the reporting manager

Not really concentrating in education but focused in getting business, which does not improve in quality of education provided.

no career development opportunities provided

Maximum hours of teaching but manageable.

Very poor management No bonus no increment

7 years I was with SEGi and I have to say: - staff turnover is very high. - facilities still so bad. - parking is the worst. - lifts breakdown 2-3 times a month. - top management only care for money. - lecturers under qualified or unqualified to teach; e.g. fresh graduate SEGi student still awaiting final year result, teaching diploma and/or degree students. - No recognition or appreciation for staff contributions, only care for top sales staffs, the rest are considered as dirt. - whatever recommendation/idea the top management ask, you give them, they let it go in one ear and come out the other ear and said your idea sucks, but then later use it and said it is their idea. So low class. - fees every month/year increase, but facilities still the same since 2007. - staffs don't work together for the greater good. All work for themselves and selfish to the point that stealing others sales is the way to go.

Quality of Students may vary

Very bad company culture and not focused on wellbeing of the staffs.

hard to find parking during weekdays

During MCO, employees are forced to come back to report to work despite rising cases solely due to audit. Audit requirements were communicated last minute to staff which lead to employees overworked. Additionally, head of department lacks competency and clueless in regards to audit requirements . In addition to that, head of department was assigned to training in regards to audit but left after 5 minutes to get a haircut as the next day is MCO.

management problem and increment slow

There are some management issues which leads many to leave

Micro management by the CEO due to profit centric policies. No emphasis on making the SEGian community feel better about working or studying here. Staff turnover / talent loss is not a priority because quality is secondary to owners. All decisions are financially driven. Top management need to hire smart and motivated individuals, not best friends and family members. The No. 1.5 position in the company changes every year because CEO can't play nice with anybody. No stability = no growth.

Most of the nice colleagues/senior staff already left after the new management taking in-charge the department. And also lack of judge staff working performance. Simply promote the staff that never do any contribution for company.

Slow progress and increment here

Job load distribution wise are not proper distributed. Some lecturer has less than 20 hours word load per week and few of them their work load more than 30 hours per week.

1. The HOD in Faculty of Pharmacy is a fake academician. No teaching, no research and want to interfere all decision. 2. No bonus and increment for many years. 3. The human resource has no power over HODs.

HR more willing to recruit new staff than promote existing ones even though both equally qualified

Limited parking spot, manual work system

Poor management, decisions on whim and fancy of top management, no structure

Stressful and don’t expect too much for increment every year.

Over workload if you are the programme leader

No job progression Unclear direction Low staff benefit

Need improvement in benefits and increments

No bonus, no increment. Atleast for 2 years

stressful stressful stressful stressful stressful

Slow increment of salary and pace of promotion.

Management style could have been better