Head of school
Mar 10, 2026Pros
Need to put in hardwork.
Cons
A lot of KPIs and innovation - too much at times
Education1, Jln Taylors, 47100 Subang Jaya, Selangor
Need to put in hardwork.
A lot of KPIs and innovation - too much at times
A place that encourage work life balance
The full flexi and open office practice may lead to employee isolation. In long term may lead to breakdowns in unit cohesion
Good Management skill is provided.
Small area and not that good admin staff
Flexible hours is something I really value.
Pressure for admin, teaching and research is amazingly high!
- Nice working environment - Has good benefits
- Toxic work culture - Managers tend to be condesending
not very much to say on this
not a very well compensated job
Great working environment Great people
please improve better on management
1) Positive Working Environment Among Academic Staff: It's worth noting that there is a positive working environment specifically among academic staff. This can foster collaboration and a sense of camaraderie among faculty members, which can be a valuable asset for academic professionals. 2) "Strong" Marketing Efforts: It's apparent that the university puts significant effort into marketing itself, although the effectiveness of this marketing may not always accurately reflect the true state of the institution. This emphasis on marketing can sometimes create misleading impressions about the university's actual condition.
1) Disconnect between Top Management and Education/Research: The top management appears to be out of touch with the demands of education and research. Faculty members are burdened with an exceptionally heavy teaching load, often leaving insufficient time for research, tutorials, and lab classes. This unrealistic workload expectation negatively impacts the quality of both teaching and research. 2) High Turnover Rate: The high turnover rate within the faculty is concerning. The university seems to have a revolving door of faculty members, with more than eight turnovers within six months in the same department. This constant churn disrupts continuity and hampers the development of a stable academic community. 3) Lack of Appreciation: There is a lack of appreciation for the staff's contributions. The perception that everyone is replaceable and can be hired at a higher salary elsewhere is demoralizing. This mindset likely contributes to the departure of high-performing staff members, further exacerbating the high turnover problem. 4) Inefficient Management: The administrative structure appears to be inefficient, with various fragmented systems and websites causing confusion and redundancy. This inefficiency creates additional burdens on staff and detracts from their ability to focus on their primary responsibilities. 5) Unrealistic Research Expectations: The university expects staff to produce high-impact research while simultaneously imposing a maximum teaching workload. This expectation is challenging to meet without the necessary support, such as access to journals and publishers, which should be considered fundamental for academic success. 6) Low-Quality Education: The quality of education suffers due to the high turnover rate. It is common for one module to have multiple lecturers, often teaching subjects they are not familiar with, resulting in a subpar learning experience for students. This is a concerning trend that undermines the university's reputation and the value of its education. Given these challenges, I would not recommend this university as an ideal place for academic or professional growth, nor would I consider it a suitable institution for my own children to study at. It is crucial for the university's top management to address these issues promptly and effectively to improve the overall academic environment and reputation of the institution.
Salary above average with normal benefits.
Back to back projects and too much of workloads.
Somewhat good environment and helpful
Lack benefits and no perks.