Chubb Employee Reviews & Ratings

Promotions take a long time to develop and are very much dictated by Human Resources conception of what should happen across the company instead of per person.

Sweatshop, the company keeps annual raises at a minimum for anyone that is not an underwriter.

Don’t have any ideas at the mơmnt

dealing with 'old school' peoples

Management, work life balance. Management sets you up to fail

Localization and local authority to be improved

Timeline are not reasonable Timezone and geographical challenge

Not as flexible as they say they are, less than normal pay for certain positions, horrible recognition for hard work during busy times (more like judgment).

Return to work, slow systems

Protective of employees who cannot do their job and defends constant mistakes. If you’re a strong person with a great ability you won’t fit in. If you’re not a suck up this place is not for you

Teams are not working harmoniously. They have their own empire

bad management lack of training development

Salary is not competitive and turnover

Lean budget and resources. Bureaucracy

Short staff when people leave they don’t fill the positions

Cant think of any really

all in all no major contras

No cons ra there in chubb

- relatively 'flat' organizational structure - lack of salary transparency

benefits lengthy working periods too much goverbance

It is "Corporate America" so no different then any other large financial institution; Large number of people all looking to be promoted to a few positions.

No promotion or growth, working remotely

The company maintains a facade of digital transformation, but in reality, it’s entrenched in outdated systems and rigid waterfall processes, with technical decisions made solely based on cost by non-technical business stakeholders. There’s massive inconsistency in workload between teams—some are overloaded, while others barely engage—fueling resentment and disengagement. Leadership is often inexperienced, with many promoted without merit into roles they’re unqualified for, creating a culture of incompetence, insecurity, and toxicity. Office politics are rampant, and there’s an unhealthy, cutthroat competition between teams and individuals chasing visibility and promotions, often at the expense of collaboration and delivery quality. The pressure to move fast leads to poor outcomes and technical debt, while management remains focused on optics over real progress. Once known for attractive compensation, salaries are no longer competitive, removing one of the few reasons people stayed. Overall, a deeply toxic and politically driven environment—not recommended.

A very top down management

Supervisors/Management in Phoenix building as a whole. No room to promote unless you switch departments completely. Micromanagement at it’s finest. Recent merger has caused a ton of issues. New company is very cheap.

Nothing as such, my bad had to leave due to personal reasons.

Salary could be more competitive

Managers not suited to roles, poor remuneration and nil work life balance despite them having a policy. The nuc is really bad with high turnover and excessive work volume. It is a sink or swim environment. Ineffective managers who would stab you in the back to make themselves look good. Definitely not the place to go, its just not worth it. The list of cons could go on and on.

Looking forward to an expanded WFH base

Not giving gift if u r expecting anything extra den ur salary

The workload here is among the highest that I have experienced, with a high turnover, you get to deal with fires from other people's desk who has left. The company is also too big and without a proper training module, you are often lost.

Slow at first In office Outdated offices (PHL) Na

Few bonuses and commissions, compensation

Benefits, pay, internal politics, work life balance

Merger with Ace changed the dynamic, work culture was no longer a priority

None come to mind at this time

A con is the workload.

Management, they just look out for themselves. Obvious favoritism and if you don't fit in as a favorite, they push you out. Met with HR and reviewed with them errors in monthly performance reports. They discussed with management and agreed they were incorrect. Still used it to terminate. When CEO was questioned about the low morale with in the company, he blamed the person who ask the question and told them they should look in the mirror.

not easy to advance developer role to next levels

Unreasonable goals, frequent restructuring, too much to do and too few people to do it, culture no longer includes a focus on work-life balance

Fast-paced, more execution-focused v. strategy-aligned

After a few years there is no where to go. To get promoted you have to leave

Every specific and can get in trouble very quickly, have to be on your toes. No room for error. Low pay compared to the field, low bonuses. Moving up the company is very difficult.

After the president Dean O'Hare retired the company started to change and was no longer family and employee focused.

Nothing is bad working at Chubb

- No more opportunities to get promotion or advancement - Working manually quite often - Assignment between employees isn't fair enough - Salary is low compared to the workload and experience

Very unwilling to be flexible Not a great work/life balance Salary could be better

Bad management Pay is not good for what we are doing Firm has changed a lot in the last 6 months

- The Head of Department is keeping an eye on the clock. Staff members are expected to be in the office from 9am to 6.30pm despite of other commitments outside work such as having to drop off or pick up kids from day care. If you ignore this as you really need to pick up your kid and decided to leave at 5pm, you will be frowned upon - Unrealistic expectations, e.g. new team members are expected to deliver critical deadlines from Day 1 despite of minimal introduction to the company’s specific strategies and basics - Micro-management - Management fostered a culture of always provide the business whatever they want ANYTIME they want. So, last minute requests are deemed as normal and will ALWAYS need to be fulfilled. No one has ever pushed back as they view the business as king being the cash cows. This is not wrong, but to do this at the expense of their staff’s health and wellbeing is not right - Management thinks there’s nothing wrong with all of the above as they think working in their team is NOT FOR EVERYONE

Once you've joined, material salary increases are difficult to come by. Work-life flexibility seems to depend upon manager.