Prudential plc Employee Reviews & Ratings

Do not have OT just basic

Nothing as such, Good Company

Career path is not very clear

the staff medical plan is weak compare to other places ive worked at, the working environment is pretty small but managable

Long working hours Struggle to keep up with new tech

Micro managed, dealing with angry customers

overall is good, no cons

Powerful users leading to uncertainty

Sometimes it is lacking of resources

Many layers in a process to make a decision Work-life balance

Highly stressful if want to achieve very high income

none at the moment lol

Hierarchy and micromanagement, also people from another team are always impolite and rude

There will be unrealistic target and alot of OT, will feel very exhausted

Terribly poor leadership and execution. Hiring people from Allianz in the name of transformation has resulted in a terrible mess of rivalry and forcing existing staff to leave. Tech operational teams work on duplicated processes - too many ppt decks and presentations that have no value at all. Too many overlaps between the Group and local levels. It's a huge MNC that operates like messy startups. Too many chiefs spoil the broth. Many of them come from Citi and Manulife also. Chief and directors do not have the courage to be accountable. Big 4s are paid and relied heavily for strategy and execution. Staff is always unfairly treated with biased approaches. Others fight to take the credit of your work. Your work and performance are devalued, even though you had helped the bosses and colleagues. Those with the loudest voice will try to overpower you at all costs. They will try ways to gnash and kick you out if possible, especially if you do not fit into their political agenda and territorial wars. Even the finance plays politics to take up the role for chief of staff in tech team. HR does nothing but takes side and join in the politics so to save their positions. HRBPs do not operate like business partners, more like biased opionated executors. They are brutally unethical.

You need to be very independent and a fast learner.

High work load and horrible bosses

No much of cons yet.

Salary is a bit low.

No basic salary and no client base

Salary could be better None I can think of

Quota is hard to get

Targets oriented Experience dependent on the team you join and mentor you have Needs discipline

Everything else, company needs a complete change to be fit for purpose. Lots of toxicity in the office too, certain managers in particular. Higher ups know about these issues, just don’t appear interested in actively addressing them regardless of how many staff they lose as a result.

Technical skills are very old

The more you work, the more you gain. You're your boss, procrastination is your big enemy especially if you just graduated from school.

Can't really think of any

No worklife balance Heavy workload

Lack of training and support depending on agency.

salary is low, unless you have passed many professional actuarial papers

Historically weak leadership, turbulent organisational changes, lack of empathy. In the process of turning around, but major challenges persist, producing generally low job satisifcation and morale.

A bit lower pay than market.

Need to hit almost unimaginable quota

Not much increment. Mostly 6% -10%

Sometimes work long hours and weekends

There is alot of attrition

No base pay where stability is important

Can't seem to find any

Depending on the agency that you join.

Income not guaranteed. Management at agency level not supportive.

Salary is commission based and a bit hard at the start

If your supervisor doesn't like you, you die!

Hard to have work life balance

Beware foreign employee whoever want to work in Prudential Cambodia. The local employees and their senior management harass the foreign employees till impact to financial and mental well-being.

the work was quite tedious

Market is currently very saturated

Work is hectic and never-ending

The bosses are not good in guidance and like to use vision & mission as an obligation to suppress our work life balance

Bad performance in recent years resulting in laying off employees

Slow to change, make bold moves and execute all the way