S&P Global Employee Reviews & Ratings

Low appraisal percentage given every year

Comp is low compared to similar companies and roles

Lack of career progression and opportunities

As a fresher, unrealistic expectations

I have not found and cons till now

Slowly outsourcing all North American positions. High level of bureaucracy.

AB, BC, CD, DE, FE

nothing to share for cons

No concern and its a good compaby

I haven't been with the company long enough to experience any cons.

strict in-office requirements that preclude certain candidates

- Growth can be difficult - Pay could be better - Frequent changes in leadership and layoffs

Some managers are difficult and exploit company benefits, career growth felt stalled

Nothing specific to that I can recall

Hghyg ho fatto il testimone

Remuneration and work life balance

- Does not pay as per industry standard - Lesser scope of learning

Sales and marketing not necessary, money just walked in the door. Salespeople would congratulate themselves on a success and blame market vagaries on failure, when in fact they had little effect either way on company performance. Management was endlessly restructured. In eight years I went through four CEOs and five line managers, with no opportunity for promotion.

No cons as per me

Growth is very slow here.

Work life balance could be better

Since the new leadership took over, it’s clear that they are anti-American. There is little interest in hiring or promoting Americans. Layoffs are all in the USA. Almost all open positions are based in India. On top of that, layoffs are not performance based since they let go competent employees who do the work while the incompetent persist. The new leadership is completely inept when it comes to organic growth outside of Ratings since they have a track record of over relying on layoffs to prop margins. They also will buy companies but because they are inept when it comes to integrating those companies and leveraging the value of those companies, they rarely perform well. The only reason why Ratings is successful is because the Ratings industry is an oligopoly. On top of that, senior mgmt gaslights employees. The mid-year Vibe employee survey results just came in…naturally scores were abismal (particularly in North America). Executives are blaming ‘WFH’ as the reason why there were low scores when it came to feeling connected to the company. Completely ignoring that there are quarterly layoffs and people are overworked/overwhelmed because executives only cares about margins. There are more layoffs coming in August…likely before the Q3 earnings announcement. They do not care about employees…they will work people into the ground (particularly in the USA and London) to get what they want and then lay them off before quarterly earnings. They have had at least two data breaches b/c they over rely on India to manage security and tech. Somehow those data breaches went unnoticed… They often release broken product/features that hasn’t gone through the rigorous testing that I would expect a company like S&P Global to have.

NA, NA, NA , NA , NA

There are micro management in Few teams, Less hikes, Management is biased

Low-end salaries that are not market competitive anymore

Not that much scope of learning in few projects

seniors not cooperate to work they shy sharing their accumulated knowledge of product timesheets reporting discourages to collaborate with team on issues my manager was on leave mostly

Can't think of any of the top

Too many people from one country of the world which can make work so hard

Can be very business line focused but employees are encouraged to change to desired roles

Culture varies by team, people stay too long

Lots of favouritism while handing out promotions, and pay is below market standards.

-Less pay, unclear vision, too many acquisitions and mergers

Pay is okay, growth is slow

Large organisation, Change can be slow. Technology is sometimes disconnected from the users.

Lack of proper training, too many internal processes. Work load can be overwhelming at times

Low salaries Demotivating internal politics

- Global teams are insecure

Part of staff overseas, difficult communication at times

Nothing as such. All well

Bad management, No concept of leaves as you still have to complete the work.

No cons for the company

Sometimes I feel overworked and burnt out. But this is do to management over promising what our already burnt out team can deliver.

No work culture or incentive for office

Hope to return as it was a great place to work.

S&P Global's will not suit everyone. That should be apparent from its businesses, size and salary structure.

Hectic and super competitive. Pretty much thats it.

Nothing much in particular, no cons.

Nothing as of now here

Not many internal jobs to apply.