S&P Global Employee Reviews & Ratings

Promotion cycle is slow. One has to really work hard to get one.

Office politics and unrealistic timelines

However, there is little transparency into the processes and you receive announcements from the top without much clarity. Going from an entrepreneurial space, S&P is very process-oriented and there is little space for risk taking.

Few opportunities to grow internally

Big company, sometimes difficult to get noticed

-no available leadership training -slow internal hiring process -leaders can be bias in promoting employee; doesn’t listen to criticism; lack of leadership skills or product/process knowledge

Very very poor salary, much underpaid.

benefits and salary is not good as peers

Frequent firing going on always

- Opportunities to resume a career after a break is not possible. You will receive no help or be considered for a position as a former employee.

Very corporate environment, hierarchal, regulated

Limited mobility to work abroad

There are no drawbacks that come to mind

Nothing to complain about as of now

Less pay as per market standards

Opportunities for advancement are a bit slower - good company for those looking for stable employment, but not for those looking to rise the ranks quickly

Your colleagues will try and take your commission by giving licenses to companies in your territory.

Pay could be a little better

Average pay, highly bureaucratic management,

upper mobility opportunities favor self starters who would do more than required workload

Salary hikes are okayish not too much

Growth is slow. Office politics is there

Salary lower than industry players

- Heavy workload - Full return to office even when the pandemic was still ongoing (this was in 2021 to 2022, so Covid was still quite common in our country. But overall, this doesn't much detract from how good this company had been. Only wish I had been able to handle the workload.)

Sector oriented teams limits you to specific sectors instead of cross sector model

There is still some bureaucracy, but there are also very direct and efficient leaders and departments. Different areas have different management styles.

Layoffs are frequent and interchanging employee between multiple team without any prior notification

Environment is not suited for someone who want to grow fast. Even if you perform you won’t be promoted

Nothing , all good it's a very good company

They make very slow decisions

Growth opportunity is limited there

Less salary(compare to market standards) Slow promotion

Limited growth prospects , average salary

Salary, increment, promotion, Job security, management

sometimes you have to stretch your work

Constant restructuring. Red tape. Salary is below market.

Changes can seem chaotic, poor communication from senior leadership

Partiality to favourite members in the team

Base compensation is on the lower side compared to industry standards Limited integration of employee engagement activities and party culture Hiring practices often focus on Tier-3 and below institutions, which may impact overall talent quality

Promotions are hard to come by, because of how all employees are happy to be there.

Politics within team members. Management is not good.

Work pressure, less pay and no work life balance

they closed the office early this year

Little bit of a ceiling in terms of salary growth and career growth. Very good place to learn and gain experience, but depending on your personal goals it may or may not make sense to look for new roles if looking for a big move upwards.

Low growth opportunities and compensation compared to the market

Middle management changes with that goals also change

Slow Progression (depends on department) Slow innovation Old Technology Stack

Worst work life balance. Unhealthy force practices by giving unnatural targets forcing employees to work more than 14 to 15 hours, facing health issues in 6 months afterwards. No management concern on employees health. No proper guidence on future growth of their employees, non healthy shifts system for ladies as well

Less salary Lesser number of promotions

The very high-up management is awful, stagnant