S&P Global Employee Reviews & Ratings

Yearly hikes are less than other similar companies

- the promotion procedure is not very transparent

Soul sucking in a way

Many layoffs from last 5 years in the name of company cost of mergers/acquisitions done by the company..

Less salary compared to other industry.

No proper promotions. Hike percent is a little low

Low pay. no bonus. low increment

- a lot of changes - work load has gradually increased

There have been several rounds of layoffs in the last year. They are moving back to more days in office

Can be a lot of hours

less growth opportunity, slow growth, take times to skip the hierarchies

Pigeonholed by upper management, felt a lack of mobility

Slow firm Not sure where it’s going

nothing for me ,n a

pay that is nowhere near market standards

None that I can think of

Nothing is negative ine the company

Nothing Only things is they do not have good interaction with co workers

Politics and bad management and openings

could have more of a social side

the remuneration is not very competitive

No time to learn No time to explore other tools No enthusiasm and encouragement for skill boostup

Very boring work and there seems to be a lot of turn over

hardly match global pay if not based in the same country as parent company

All good Nothing to mention

no cons, missing going to the office

All depends on your team and line manager. Sadly, it can quickly become mediocre or pure hell if you are under for example a highly regarded but toxic manager. Leadership won't know a thing.

they dont pay too much, hard to grow

Internal movement is highly though in the company.

- Low annual hike - Very bad upper management - Being an employee of IHS Markit which got acquired by S&P Global, there were significant changes. Good changes were limited to Benefits. - As a developer, your performance is affected by your Github check-ins and various other metrics which don't make a lot of sense. If you are a senior developer who spends a lot of time on design and not doing enough Git commits, your performance can be affected. - Silent layoffs even if company has good revenue numbers. - Growth is extremely hard if you are on the technology side. - Tremendous amount of red tape and lot of jerking around by senior management. - US team wants to offshore all work to India and similar countries. Talent retention in US is very low.

Poor Indian leadership, compensate for their poor skills and knowledge by micromanaging. The US leadership is aware of this but still doesn't do anything. Poor, pathetic peers and non collaborative culture. Everyone plays dirty games to stay ahead in the race rather than actually doing quality work

You work from home but you can't leave your desk to use the toilet. You skip your break most days. You start work an hour earlier just to work another 2 hours later, unpaid. Almost every single day you're covering for someone, meaning doing 2, sometimes 3 people's jobs. They promote outside the US, employees with much less client satisfaction reviews, who don't work as hard or as precise as you do and aren't able to perform the functions you do. They promote people to "senior" who have been there 1 year from another country rather than someone who's been there for 5 years from the US, multiple times. Random layoffs. US citizens must work US holidays that they say you have off but that's because you need to share Columbus Day/Veterans Day/Black Friday/etc. with employees in other countries that don't celebrate those holidays, but you don't get their holidays off. I also have the highest monthly cost insurance plan and still have to pay for an annual visit.

Can get political depending on your manager and team

Layoffs are common here in India as well

A culture of accepting failure and poor outcomes for clients. Significant data inaccuracies from the research and subscriptions business. Success is rewarded with more work (80+ hour weeks, required to skip holidays and vacations). Challenging to recruit good candidates because the firm has a reputation for churn.

Low salaries and increments Less availability of management

Growth is slow.increments are not satisfied

1. Internal growth is slower comparatively

Ongoing restructuring post-IHS merger, until 2027/2028, Frequent management replacement (yearly) and high employee churn in Australia.

It gets very bureaucratic and admin heavy, especially when things are off track, the numerous acquisitions/mergers weigh on the culture, while strategy gets a big hit too

lack of interest from management

Time consuming, Difficult to crack

The company is not to be trusted. Constantly backtracking on what they commit to. Changes occur mid-way through the year giving you no time to prepare and adjust. Heavily focused on AI and doesn't care about retaining existing talent.

Little transparency on career growth opportunities. Culture isnt the best.

None that I can think of yet

Slow Growth as not a lot of scope to enhance your skill.

No cons as per now

I didnt experience any of this

No cons as such as of now

Internal mobility and career advance is slow or non-exist. Some people there can be mean and cut-throat