S&P Global Employee Reviews & Ratings

Base pays are low compared to competitors. Growth is stale. Not a lot of opportunity to move within the company or move up a grade level. Promised quarterly promotions but that was changed to bi-annual.

too much work to do sometimes.

Very slow career growth and progress

Absolutely no job security—you can be let go overnight regardless of your performance. Toxic corporate culture masked by a polished employer brand. Decisions are top-down and opaque—zero regard for team contributions. Mental health is ignored despite unrealistic workloads and late hours. False branding as an “employee-friendly” organization—when in reality, you're just a cell in an Excel sheet.

Susceptible to workplace politics, your experience will depend on your team leader, this location has a lower base pay compared to other

None I don't see any

I can't think of any con; the company has all pros: good pay, good work-life balance, good learning opportunities, good work quantity, solid impact

None. I liked the place and the environment.

The culture heavily depends on the team you're placed in. While some teams are fantastic, others can feel toxic. I personally witnessed teams where managers were overly controlling, micromanaged every detail, and created unnecessary pressure.

Increase the pay scale of the employees

Benefit package and bonus not as competitive as other sectors

No cons as of now.

Training programs could be better

they do fire people very randomly as well

Not applicable anything on top of my mind

Redundacy process is running every quarter..

less internal growth as in promotion point of view

Will not make you financially stable

Pay isn't bad by itself however, it is really low relative to the market and that is the only downside. It's not uncommon for teammates to find better opportunities in the financial sector elsewhere after 2-3 years. Typically you have to pick up extra work when that happens. Additionally, promotions are fairly opaque and there aren't really guidelines or a framework for how your career (aka compensation) can grow in the role or at the company - which is likely another factor in why people search for better opportunities after a few years. Raises aren't significant and they really only match inflation. If you spend 3-5 years in the role, you can take a peek at LinkedIn jobs to see roles with your experience advertising 1.5-2x your base comp which makes it a no brainer to leave. The unique experiences that was described in my pros makes it relatively easy to find new opportunities if the job market is aligned.

Constant reorganization (Layoffs) Not much training and knowledge sharing Slow career progression (Delayed promotion or even no promotion, people in high cost region are not getting promoted even they did well) Low salary

Medium in giving out salaries

you have to look for opportunities by yourself strict with technology usage, late in adapting to advancements since data security is top priority of the company

None for me as I had a nice experience working there

Worst management I have ever experienced and everyone is in it for themselves. I have never worked with a more disorganised leadership team and I was so surprised with how the People Leaders (managers). No progression path unless your manager is decent. I was told that progression comes down to luck. People that had been there for less time than I was, and younger than I was with less years of overall job experience were getting promoted to senior positions when they know little about the markets they are covering. Managers learn most of their roles on the job and talent moves around quickly. Most people are in it for themselves and there is a poor team mentality. Often hire people from other countries with no experience which is a real shame. Apprentices and trainees are often left curious as to why they are doing a very similar job than the price reporters but for £20k less.

Below Market salary compared to competitors. Constant budget cuts and layoffs over past couple years have hurt morale

Not a very high ceiling for career. Most employees have to start temp and may not be converted for up to a year.

Lack of passion for the business/products (reflects a more established larger business)

None other than the role I was originally interviewed for was elimated after my offer so I was offered an alternative role.

Frequent changes in company leadership and governance Shifting priorities every 6-12 months create uncertainty Hard to plan long-term career growth within the company Some internal politics and restructuring can be disruptive

1) Slow growth 2) No more recognition except promotion

Advancement channels may be limited.

Very low salary as compared to market. Learning is very low as they have internal clients.

1) Management of some teams needs to grow out of the school mindset.

No car lease policy in company

delay response for everything. it is like working in a supermarket.

Pay scale, tech stack in some projects

The company has substandard pay

Very political at the very high levels of the organization

Increment poor Work life balance is not there Operations work is bad No pay transparency, salary band is very wide almost 17LPA difference between high and low band

Rigid pay range Business lacks innovation

Limited growth, and work could be boring for some people

Politics Poor leadership Unfair pay range for old employees

- More EMEA leaning, limited growth in the U.S.

A lot of micromanagement, not necessarily the fault of directors but the executives make horrible decisions and think that automation will some how fix people from drowning and yell at you for not automating when we don’t know how to make technology nor do we have the time to when we can hardly keep up with current commitments

Some team is not good like PVR.

I don't see any major cons in sp global

Pay scale needs improvement to lot of extent

By the time I left they were gutting the place to cut costs.

Below market pay Slow/old school culture

Leadership not great at communication